p. 1−1
1735-367X
Vol.7/No.4
p. 210−216
1735-367X
Vol.7/No.4
p. 217−225
1735-367X
Vol.7/No.4
0.05). No differences between the mean sRANKL concentration in the buccal and lingual sites were found (p=0.693). Conclusion: Our results may suggest that peri-implant crevicular fluid analysis of sRANKL in conjunction with some other osteoclastogenic mediators could be further investigated in well-designed prospective longitudinal studies on a larger-scale sample size in the evaluation of dental implants.]]>
p. 226−233
1735-367X
Vol.7/No.4
p. 234−239
1735-367X
Vol.7/No.4
p. 240−246
1735-367X
Vol.7/No.4
p. 247−251
1735-367X
Vol.7/No.4
p. 252−256
1735-367X
Vol.7/No.4